Farley v. Martin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1589
DAVID P. FARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID J. MARTIN, Owner-President of Martin Properties; BOB DASCOMBE, Senior Vice Presi- dent Martin Properties; STRICKLAND CONSULTING SERVICES, INCORPORATED; R.W. MOORE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-218-5-F)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farley v. Martin (Farley v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.