Farley v. Martin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farley v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 F. App'x 172
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2001·No. 01-1589·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1589

DAVID P. FARLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID J. MARTIN, Owner-President of Martin Properties; BOB DASCOMBE, Senior Vice Presi- dent Martin Properties; STRICKLAND CONSULTING SERVICES, INCORPORATED; R.W. MOORE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-218-5-F)

Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David P. Farley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farley v. Martin, (4th Cir. 2001).

Farley v. Martin (Farley v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.