Farley v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

Farley v. Martin

15 F. App'x 172

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2001·No. No. 01-1589·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Farley v. Martin, 15 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

15 F. App'x 172 (Farley v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related