Farley v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

Farley v. Martin

15 F. App'x 172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 2001

DocketNo. 01-1589

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 15 F. App'x 172 (Farley v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. Martin, 15 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. App'x 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-martin-ca4-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack