FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN v. KYLE MCDONALD

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 2023
Docket23-0211
StatusPublished

This text of FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN v. KYLE MCDONALD (FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN v. KYLE MCDONALD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN v. KYLE MCDONALD, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D23-211 LT Case No. 21-CA-1705 _____________________________

FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN,

Appellant,

v.

KYLE MCDONALD,

Appellee. _____________________________

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Virginia Norton, Judge.

Christian J. Lake, of Alexander Degance Barnett, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Thomas S. Edwards, Jr., and Jennifer L. Reiber, of Edwards & Ragatz, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

December 8, 2023

EDWARDS, C.J.

Appellant, Farahnaz Ghandi McGlothin, appeals the trial court’s order granting Appellee, Kyle McDonald’s, motion to amend his complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. We agree that Appellee’s proffer was insufficient to support a claim that Appellant’s placement of concrete blocks that restricted drainage through a common grate constituted intentional misconduct or gross negligence. Appellee proffered nothing to suggest that Appellant had “actual knowledge” of the wrongfulness of her conduct or that there was a high probability that it would result in harm to Appellee. See Werner Enters., Inc. v. Mendez, 362 So. 3d 278, 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023). Furthermore, Appellee’s proposed amended complaint improperly set forth his claim for punitive damages as a stand-alone count. See Keen v. Jennings, 327 So. 3d 435, 438–39 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (citing Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 187 So. 3d 1219, 1221 (Fla. 2016) and Varnedore v. Copeland, 210 So. 3d 741, 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)); see also Frugoli v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 464 So. 2d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse, quash the order permitting Appellee to amend his complaint to seek punitive damages, and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

REVERSED; ORDER QUASHED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BOATWRIGHT, J., concurs. JAY, J., dissents, without opinion.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frugoli v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
464 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Lucille Ruth Soffer, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
187 So. 3d 1219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Varnedore v. Copeland
210 So. 3d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN v. KYLE MCDONALD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farahnaz-ghandi-mcglothin-v-kyle-mcdonald-fladistctapp-2023.