Fanning v. Boston Market Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Fanning v. Boston Market Corp.

262 F. App'x 999

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 2008

DocketNo. 07-11929

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 262 F. App'x 999 (Fanning v. Boston Market Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fanning v. Boston Market Corp., 262 F. App'x 999 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiff-Appellant Bettye Fanning has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s March 26, 2007 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of February 26, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms the March 26, 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Boston Market Corporation as to Fanning’s federal claims and dismissing her state-law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiff-Appellant Bettye Fanning has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s March 26, 2007 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of February 26, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms the March 26, 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Boston Market Corporation as to Fanning’s federal claims and dismissing her state-law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F. App'x 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fanning-v-boston-market-corp-ca11-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack