Fanning v. Boston Market Corp.
262 F. App'x 999
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 23, 2008·No. No. 07-11929·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiff-Appellant Bettye Fanning has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s March 26, 2007 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of February 26, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms the March 26, 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Boston Market Corporation as to Fanning’s federal claims and dismissing her state-law claims without prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fanning v. Boston Market Corp., 262 F. App'x 999 (11th Cir. 2008).
262 F. App'x 999 (Fanning v. Boston Market Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
M.D. Florida, 2021
Fischer v. Federal National Mortgage Association
S.D. Florida, 2020
Malverty v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
M.D. Florida, 2019
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Foxx
971 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (M.D. Florida, 2013)
Anita Joy Simpson v. Certegy Check Services, Inc.
513 F. App'x 843 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Grimsley v. Moody, Jones, Ingino & Morehead, P.A.
126 So. 3d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Stroud v. Bank of America
886 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Meisel v. USA SHADE AND FABRIC STRUCTURES INC.
795 F. Supp. 2d 481 (N.D. Texas, 2011)
Sigler v. RBC BANK (USA)
712 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (M.D. Alabama, 2010)
Wenner v. Bank of America, NA
637 F. Supp. 2d 944 (D. Kansas, 2009)
Tilley v. Global Payments, Inc.
603 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (D. Kansas, 2009)
Ross v. Washington Mutual Bank
566 F. Supp. 2d 468 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)