Fancy Hill Coal Works v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 142, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2523
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1925
DocketDocket No. 2847.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 142 (Fancy Hill Coal Works v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fancy Hill Coal Works v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 142, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2523 (bta 1925).

Opinion

This appeal came on for hearing upon the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss upon the ground that no appeal had been filed by the taxpayer or any authorized agent of the taxpayer.

Ivins : The taxpayer, a common-law trust taxable as a corporation, was dissolved about August 1, 1920. John B. Moore was the last operating trustee. On January 29, 1925, the Commissioner determined a deficiency against the taxpayer for income and profits taxes for the year 1920. From this determination John B. Moore filed an appeal in the name of the taxpayer, stating in his petition:

* * * the said John B. Moore without authority or office volunteers to answer the communication from the Department of Internal Kevenue and to conduct an appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals * * *.

The Commissioner moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that it is not filed by the taxpayer or its authorized representative.

When a corporation is dissolved its directors continue to represent it, as trustees in liquidation, under the statutes of most of the States. But no authority has been cited to us for the proposition that a trustee of a dissolved trust continues to be a legal representative of the trust, and Moore in his petition admits that he acts without authority. The parties in interest are the shareholders among whom the assets of the trust were distributed in liquidation, the Commissioner must collect the deficiency, if any is to be collected, from them, and they are the proper persons to prosecute any appeal or defend any suit for collection.

' The Commissioner’s motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garst Trust v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 177 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Harold Patz Trust v. Commissioner
69 T.C. 497 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Fancy Hill Coal Works v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 142 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 142, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fancy-hill-coal-works-v-commissioner-bta-1925.