Falso v. Sutherland Global Services

375 F. App'x 113

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
• Decided: April 29, 2010
• Docket: 09-0232-cv
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Anthony Falso, pro se, appeals from a January 13, 2009 judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J.). Falso claims, inter alia, employment discrimination and a hostile work environment viola-tive of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. In the order relevant to this appeal, the district court dismissed Falso’s claims, directing summary judgment for the defendants. We otherwise assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the case’s procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

The grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. E.g. Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). Summary judgment is appropriate where, drawing “all factual inferences ... in favor of the non-moving party[,] ... there are no genuine issues of material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. (citation omitted). On review, we find no error, and affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its summary judgment order.

We have considered Falso’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. The district court’s judgment is accordingly AFFIRMED.