Falk v. Crystal Hall Inc.
279 A.D. 1073, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 1952·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
As defendants were joint tortfeasors we think the result arrived at by Trial Term was correct. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See ante, p. 1071; 280 App. Div. 861.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Falk v. Crystal Hall Inc., 279 A.D. 1073, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1073 (Falk v. Crystal Hall Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D'Ambrosio v. City of New York
435 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Weinberg v. Wing
16 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
O'Dowd v. American Surety Co.
144 N.E.2d 359 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
Ruping v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
283 A.D. 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)