Falk v. Crystal Hall, Inc.
279 A.D. 1071, 113 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1952·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
As defendants were joint tortfeasors we think the result arrived at by Special Term was correct. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [200 Mise. 979.] [See post, p. 1073.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Falk v. Crystal Hall, Inc., 279 A.D. 1071, 113 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1071 (Falk v. Crystal Hall, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tobin v. American Surety Co.
32 Misc. 2d 687 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Bush Terminal Buildings Co. v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
11 A.D.2d 220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Bush Terminal Building Co. v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
22 Misc. 2d 791 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Grazioso v. City of New York
11 Misc. 2d 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Vanino v. Bruckman
7 Misc. 2d 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Good Neighbor Federation v. Pathe Industries, Inc.
202 Misc. 951 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)