Fairhaven Publishing Co. v. City of Bellingham

98 P. 97, 51 Wash. 108, 1908 Wash. LEXIS 977
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1908
DocketNo. 7223
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 98 P. 97 (Fairhaven Publishing Co. v. City of Bellingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairhaven Publishing Co. v. City of Bellingham, 98 P. 97, 51 Wash. 108, 1908 Wash. LEXIS 977 (Wash. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The city charter of the city of Bellingham provides that the city council shall annually let all the legal advertising to the lowest and best responsible bidder, who [109]*109shall give bonds to the city in such sum as may be fixed and approved by the city council, conditioned that he will publish all such legal advertising in a paper named in the bid, which paper it may be conceded for the purpose of this case is required to be a daily paper printed and published in the city of Bellingham. Pursuant to this provision of the charter, the city advertised for bids for doing the legal advertising of the city for the year 1908. Two bids were received in response to the notice, the one from the appellant, who is proprietor and publisher of the Bellingham Herald, a newspaper printed and published in the city of Bellingham six days in each week; the other from the American Printing Company, which is publisher and proprietor of The Morning Reveille, a newspaper printed and published in the city of Bellingham five days in each week, that is, every day except Sunday and Monday. The city council found the bid of the latter company the lowest and best, and proceeded to let the contract for the printing to that company. The appellant thereupon brought this action to restrain the council from so doing. Judgment went against them in the lower court, and this appeal is prosecuted therefrom.

The only question we are required to notice is whether The Morning Reveille is a daily paper, within the meaning of that term as it is used in the city charter. We think it is. The term daily, as applied to the publication of newspapers, is relative. It has never been given the exclusive meaning of every day of the week, month or year, but papers published every day except Sunday, or every day except Monday, or every day except both Sunday and Monday, are regarded by the general public as daily papers. This court in Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co., 33 Wash. 551, 74 Pac. 802, held that a paper published every day except Sunday and legal holidays was a daily paper, and cited approvingly a case from California which held that a paper published every day except Monday was such a paper. A paper omitting both days may be less a daily publication than either [110]*110of these cited instances, but it is not so widely different from them as to require it to be put into a distinct class. It is a daily paper in the popular sense, and it was in this sense that the term was used in the city charter.

The judgment -appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Swan v. Jones
289 P.2d 982 (Washington Supreme Court, 1955)
State Ex Rel. Winn v. City of San Antonio
259 S.W.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
State Ex Rel. Item Co. v. O'Neill
4 So. 2d 633 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Hansen v. City of Havre
114 P.2d 1053 (Montana Supreme Court, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Item Co. v. Commissioner of Public Finances
109 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
City of Bellingham v. Bellingham Publishing Co.
198 P. 369 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
First National Bank v. Kennedy
157 P. 417 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Alley v. City of Muskogee
1916 OK 332 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 P. 97, 51 Wash. 108, 1908 Wash. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairhaven-publishing-co-v-city-of-bellingham-wash-1908.