Fairclough v. Baumgartner
84 A.2d 545, 8 N.J. 187
Opinion
ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*190 Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).
Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fairclough v. Baumgartner, 84 A.2d 545, 8 N.J. 187 (N.J. 1951).
84 A.2d 545 (Fairclough v. Baumgartner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Congregation Sons of Israel v. Congregation Meorosnosson, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2026
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Leasehold Estates, Inc. v. Fulbro Holding Co.
136 A.2d 423 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)