Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

421 N.W.2d 302, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 309, 1988 WL 25230
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 21, 1988·No. Nos. C1-87-1245 and C3-87-1246·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions of Hawke & Company Harvestore, Inc. and Flygt Corporation for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same are, granted. Because of the consolidation of this matter with Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., CX-87-1132, all briefing shall commence as of the date of this order. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

COYNE and POPOVICH, JJ., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 421 N.W.2d 302, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 309, 1988 WL 25230 (Mich. 1988).

421 N.W.2d 302 (Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.