Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

419 N.W.2d 618, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 211, 1988 WL 15188
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 24, 1988·No. Nos. C1-87-1245, C3-87-1246·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. and A.O. Smith Corporation for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is consolidated with Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 416 N.W.2d 482 (Minn.App.1988).

COYNE, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 419 N.W.2d 618, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 211, 1988 WL 15188 (Mich. 1988).

419 N.W.2d 618 (Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
416 N.W.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1988)