Fahy v. Procaccino

50 A.D.2d 690, 375 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536

This text of 50 A.D.2d 690 (Fahy v. Procaccino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fahy v. Procaccino, 50 A.D.2d 690, 375 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which found petitioner liable for deficiencies in personal income taxes for the years 1969, 1970 and 1971 and in unincorporated business taxes for the years 1969, 1970 and 1971 and assessed penalties thereon. This proceeding arises from petitioner’s refusal to pay personal income taxes and unincorporated business taxes. Petitioner bases such refusal primarily on the grounds that New York State moneys are expended in aid of abortion which is repugnant to his religious beliefs and that Federal reserve notes, which are presently the mode of exchange in the United States, are not "dollars” pursuant to the Tax Law and, consequently, petitioner had no reportable income. We find no merit in either of these contentions or in the other arguments urged by petitioner to annul respondent’s determination. The distinction between freedom of religious beliefs and the practice thereof is well settled (Cantwell v Connecticut, 310 US 296) and needs no further comment by us. It is equally well settled that the Federal Government’s promise to pay is equivalent in value to the requirements of the coinage acts. (Knox v Lee, 79 US 457.) Respondent’s determination, therefore, is confirmed. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knox v. Lee
79 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1871)
Cantwell v. Connecticut
310 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 690, 375 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahy-v-procaccino-nyappdiv-1975.