Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly

363 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 549781, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 210

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2012·No. ED 96787·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Fahrenkamp appeals the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay past-due earnings taxes to the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b). 1 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Fahrenkamp appeals the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay past-due earnings taxes to the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b). 1 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly, 363 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 549781, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

363 S.W.3d 384 (Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related