Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly

363 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 549781, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 210

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 2012

DocketED 96787

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 363 S.W.3d 384 (Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fahrenkamp v. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Daly, 363 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 549781, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Fahrenkamp appeals the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay past-due earnings taxes to the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b). 1 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Fahrenkamp appeals the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay past-due earnings taxes to the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b). 1 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 S.W.3d 384, 2012 WL 549781, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fahrenkamp-v-city-of-st-louis-ex-rel-daly-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack