Fagan v. State
Opinions
Note from the reporter of decisions: On February 23, 2007, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued the following order:
"The motion filed in the circuit court was not treated as a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition; no in forma pauperis declaration was filed nor was a filing fee paid.
"As we stated in Hart v. State,
"`"The right of appeal is wholly statutory. Under our statute an appeal is authorized in criminal cases only from a judgment of conviction." Dawson v. State,
37 Ala. App. 16 ,17 ,66 So. 2d 567 ,568 (1952) (emphasis added).'
"There is no statute authorizing an appeal from the denial of a postconviction motion for DNA testing.
"Moreover, while we have recognized that the need for postconviction DNA testing may be presented in a Rule 32 petition — see Barbour v.State,
"Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this appeal be DISMISSED as being from a nonappealable order. It is further ORDERED that the certificate of judgment in this case shall be issued forthwith.
"McMillan, Shaw, Wise, and Welch, JJ., concur.
"Baschab, P.J., dissents, with opinion."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
957 So. 2d 1159 (Fagan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.