Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 294

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Cust. Ct. 237 →

United States Customs Court·Decided March 3, 1955·No. No. 58795; protest 224253-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of alloy steel bars; that such bars are articles of which the component material in chief value is metal, other than ores or concentrates, or crude metal; that such bars were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and have been so used; and that there had been compliance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of alloy steel bars; that such bars are articles of which the component material in chief value is metal, other than ores or concentrates, or crude metal; that such bars were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and have been so used; and that there had been compliance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 294 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 294 (Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.