Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 237, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 984
United States Customs Court·Decided August 12, 1953·No. No. 57457; protest 186903-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of tungsten steel bars of which metal is the component material of chief value; that such bars are articles, other than ores or concentrates or crude metal, imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that the merchandise has been used in remanufacture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, as amended, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, as amended by Public Law 66, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 237, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 984 (cusc 1953).

31 Cust. Ct. 237 (Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph Behr & Sons, Inc. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 46 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)