Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.

18 A.D.2d 895, 237 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 895 (Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp., 18 A.D.2d 895, 237 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on October 18, 1962, requiring purchaser appellant to complete its purchase of the foreclosed premises within 15 days from the service of a certified copy of the order, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to provide that the purchaser appellant is to complete its purchase within 15 days after demand therefor made after final determination of the action for a declaratory judgment pending in the Supreme Court of the County of New York, Index No. 10,999— 1961, entitled 2-4 Amsterdam, Avenue Corp. v. Murray Fabricant, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant against plaintiff-respondent. Appellant, who is willing to take title, should not in equity be burdened with the pending litigation affecting the subject matter of this action. (See Simon v. Vanderveer, 155 N. Y. 377; 92 C. J. S., Vendor and Purchaser, § 196, subd. b.) Settle order on notice. Concur—‘Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [36 Misc 2d 983.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on October 18, 1962, requiring purchaser appellant to complete its purchase of the foreclosed premises within 15 days from the service of a certified copy of the order, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to provide that the purchaser appellant is to complete its purchase within 15 days after demand therefor made after final determination of the action for a declaratory judgment pending in the Supreme Court of the County of New York, Index No. 10,999— 1961, entitled 2-4 Amsterdam, Avenue Corp. v. Murray Fabricant, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant against plaintiff-respondent. Appellant, who is willing to take title, should not in equity be burdened with the pending litigation affecting the subject matter of this action. (See Simon v. Vanderveer, 155 N. Y. 377; 92 C. J. S., Vendor and Purchaser, § 196, subd. b.) Settle order on notice. Concur—‘Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [36 Misc 2d 983.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 895, 237 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabricant-v-hyed-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack