Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.

13 A.D.2d 943, 218 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 943 (Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fabricant v. Hyed Realty Corp., 13 A.D.2d 943, 218 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. No opinion. Order entered on April 7, 1960, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 27, 1959, striking out the answer of defendant-appellant and granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Order entered on April 7, 1960, directing a reference to compute the amount due on plaintiff’s bond and mortgage, unanimously affirmed, with

[944]*944$10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. No opinion. Order entered on April 7, 1960, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 27, 1959, striking out the answer of defendant-appellant and granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Order entered on April 7, 1960, directing a reference to compute the amount due on plaintiff’s bond and mortgage, unanimously affirmed, with

[944]*944$10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 943, 218 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fabricant-v-hyed-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1961.