F. B. Vandergrift & Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 859, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1995
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1967
DocketNo. P67/13; protests 60/31243, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P67/14; protests 62/12949, etc. (Philadelphia)
StatusPublished
This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 859 (F. B. Vandergrift & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
F. B. Vandergrift & Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 859, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1995 (cusc 1967).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of calcined clay, referred to as “Molochite,” similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 245, C.D. 2539), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 245 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 859, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-vandergrift-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.