F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 339, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2098
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1965
DocketNo. 69124; protest 63/18679 (Philadelphia)
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 339 (F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 339, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2098 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, invoiced as battery-operated bartenders, consists of articles of metal 'having -as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 339, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/f-b-vandegrift-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.