Ezra Pleasant v. State
Opinion
Appellant Ezra Pleasant pleaded guilty before a jury to an indictment accusing him of aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 21.11 (West 2003), § 22.021 (West Supp. 2004-05). The jury returned instructed verdicts of guilty and assessed punishment for each count at ten years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On the jury's recommendation, imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on community supervision.
Appellant's retained attorney filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious grounds of error and that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (applying to appointed counsel). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, who has not responded.
We have reviewed the record and find no error that should be reviewed in the interest of justice. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton
Affirmed
Filed: February 3, 2005
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ezra Pleasant v. State (Ezra Pleasant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.