Ezra Pleasant v. State
This text of Ezra Pleasant v. State (Ezra Pleasant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Ezra Pleasant pleaded guilty before a jury to an indictment accusing him of aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 21.11 (West 2003), § 22.021 (West Supp. 2004-05). The jury returned instructed verdicts of guilty and assessed punishment for each count at ten years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On the jury's recommendation, imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on community supervision.
Appellant's retained attorney filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious grounds of error and that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (applying to appointed counsel). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, who has not responded.
We have reviewed the record and find no error that should be reviewed in the interest of justice. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton
Affirmed
Filed: February 3, 2005
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ezra Pleasant v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ezra-pleasant-v-state-texapp-2005.