Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ey v. State

Ey v. State

851 So. 2d 804, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11411, 2003 WL 21748869
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 884 So. 2d 376 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 2003·No. No. 2D02-537·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We affirm the order denying Robert Ey’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Ey has raised an issue in his brief regarding the legality of his sentence for misdemeanor petit theft in circuit court case number 95-19712 which we cannot determine from this record, our affirmance of this case is without prejudice to any right he may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800 regarding that sentence.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ey v. State, 851 So. 2d 804, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11411, 2003 WL 21748869 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

851 So. 2d 804 (Ey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.