Ey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ey v. State

851 So. 2d 804, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11411, 2003 WL 21748869

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 30, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-537

StatusPublished

This text of 851 So. 2d 804 (Ey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ey v. State, 851 So. 2d 804, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11411, 2003 WL 21748869 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We affirm the order denying Robert Ey’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Ey has raised an issue in his brief regarding the legality of his sentence for misdemeanor petit theft in circuit court case number 95-19712 which we cannot determine from this record, our affirmance of this case is without prejudice to any right he may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800 regarding that sentence.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

We affirm the order denying Robert Ey’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Ey has raised an issue in his brief regarding the legality of his sentence for misdemeanor petit theft in circuit court case number 95-19712 which we cannot determine from this record, our affirmance of this case is without prejudice to any right he may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800 regarding that sentence.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

851 So. 2d 804, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11411, 2003 WL 21748869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ey-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.