Exxon Corporation v. Michael L. Fischer
817 F.2d 1429, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18340
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion filed January 7, 1987, 807 F.2d 842, is amended by deleting the third full paragraph on page 6 of the slip op. [page 845 2nd col., 2nd full par.] after the word “law,” and substituting the following:
When a state official acts in violation of the federal constitution, even when enforcing a state law, “he is stripped of his official or representative character.” Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 160, 28 S.Ct. 441, 454, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908). For the same reason, by virtue of the Supremacy Clause, if a state official violates a federal statute, they become “subjected in ... person to the consequences of ... individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the Supreme authority of the United States.” Id. See Cory v. White, 457 U.S. 85, 89, 102 S.Ct. 2325, 2328, 72 L.Ed.2d 694 (1982); Worcester County Trust Co. v. Riley, 302 U.S. 292, 297, 58 S.Ct. 185, 187, 82 L.Ed. 268 (1937).
We conclude that the Eleventh Amendment does not apply.
With this exception, the petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Exxon Corporation v. Michael L. Fischer, 817 F.2d 1429, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18340 (9th Cir. 1987).
817 F.2d 1429 (Exxon Corporation v. Michael L. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Office of Hawai'ian Affairs v. Department of Education
951 F. Supp. 1484 (D. Hawaii, 1996)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 532 v. Brink Construction Company
825 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)