Exxon Corp. v. Lewis

371 So. 2d 129, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17090
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 29, 1978
DocketNo. JJ-364
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 371 So. 2d 129 (Exxon Corp. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exxon Corp. v. Lewis, 371 So. 2d 129, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17090 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before us on appeal from final agency action holding Exxon’s claims for severance tax refunds for the period March 1, 1974 through December 31, 1976 are barred under Florida Statute § 211.-06(2). The issue on appeal is whether Florida Statute § 211.06(2)1 applies and bars the claim (as contended by DOR) or whether Florida Statute § 215.262 applies and the claims are timely filed (as contended by appellant).

[130]*130We hold that § 215.26 controls and allows three years after accrual of the right to a refund within which the taxpayer can file application with the Comptroller for the refund. That statute expressly provides that unless filed within the three-year period “such right shall be barred . ”, thereby signaling its effect as a non-claim statute.

As to Florida Statute § 211.06, its apparent function is to authorize the DOR to adopt regulations for processing taxpayer adjustments within one year of payment of the tax. Under this statute the DOR, as the collecting agency, is permitted to initially pass upon and determine refund questions during the first year following payment, though application to the Comptroller for release of any appropriated monies needed for refunds is still contemplated. No language in § 211.06 puts the taxpayer on notice that, as claimed by DOR, severance tax refunds can only be claimed within the one year following payment, and we reject that strained construction in favor of the clear language of § 215.26 allowing a three-year period for tax refunds.

Accordingly, the ruling ' below is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for consideration on the merits.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Causeway Lumber Co. v. Lewis
410 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 So. 2d 129, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exxon-corp-v-lewis-fladistctapp-1978.