Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs

721 F.2d 1323
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 27, 1983·No. No. 82-3166·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellees have urged that this appeal should be dismissed for mootness. The parties do not agree on the factual occurrences since the entry of the judgment in the district court. In order that we may properly address this issue we remand the matter to the district court and request that proceedings be had so as to allow the making of additional findings surrounding the issue of mootness. We request that this be done within ninety (90) days. Jurisdiction is retained and the matter will be ruled upon following this limited remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs, 721 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir. 1983).

721 F.2d 1323 (Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs
721 F.2d 1323 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)