Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs

721 F.2d 1323, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1983
Docket82-3166
StatusPublished

This text of 721 F.2d 1323 (Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs, 721 F.2d 1323, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174 (11th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

721 F.2d 1323

EXPEDIENT SERVICES, INC., John Curry, Ralph Rhinelander, and
Richard Frazier, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs- Appellants,
v.
James M. BEGGS, Administrator of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, and Raymond J. Donovan,
Secretary of Labor, United States Dept.
of Labor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 82-3166.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 27, 1983.

William H. Andrews, Robert G. Riegel, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., Michael Ernest Avakian, Center On National Labor Policy, North Springfield, Va., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kendell Wherry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Orlando, Fla., June Edwards Wagoner, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before FAY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellees have urged that this appeal should be dismissed for mootness. The parties do not agree on the factual occurrences since the entry of the judgment in the district court. In order that we may properly address this issue we remand the matter to the district court and request that proceedings be had so as to allow the making of additional findings surrounding the issue of mootness. We request that this be done within ninety (90) days. Jurisdiction is retained and the matter will be ruled upon following this limited remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Expedient Services, Inc. v. Beggs
721 F.2d 1323 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 F.2d 1323, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/expedient-services-inc-v-beggs-ca11-1983.