EXCEL AUTO GROUP v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

777 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 2001 WL 127669
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 2001
Docket5D01-131
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 1187 (EXCEL AUTO GROUP v. Ford Motor Credit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EXCEL AUTO GROUP v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 777 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 2001 WL 127669 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

777 So.2d 1187 (2001)

EXCEL AUTO GROUP, INC., etc., Petitioner,
v.
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 5D01-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 16, 2001.

David J. Volk of Volk Law Offices, P.A., Melbourne, for Petitioner.

Roger A. Kelly of Rush, Marshall, Jones and Kelly, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition filed January 16, 2001, Excel Auto Group, Inc. (Excel) seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court rendered December 12, 2000. We dismiss the petition for lack for jurisdiction.

*1188 Pursuant to rule 9.100(c)(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, a certiorari petition must be filed within thirty (30) days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. This time limit is jurisdictional. Jones v. Cannon, 750 So.2d 108, 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Excel contends the time should be extended to allow for mailing pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d). But that rule does not apply to the filing of a notice of appeal or petition for certiorari. See Turner v. State, 557 So.2d 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Bouchard v. State Dep't of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 448 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); cf. Shields v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 513 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (stating that timely mailing of a notice of appeal within thirty days does not suffice).

PETITION DISMISSED.

SHARP, W., HARRIS and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guardian Ad Litem v. v. C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Crumby v. State
41 So. 3d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Caldwell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
980 So. 2d 1226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1338, 2001 WL 127669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excel-auto-group-v-ford-motor-credit-co-fladistctapp-2001.