Crumby v. State

41 So. 3d 1092, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 2010 WL 3190680
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 2010
Docket1D10-2192
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 So. 3d 1092 (Crumby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crumby v. State, 41 So. 3d 1092, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 2010 WL 3190680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Excel Auto Group, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Ill So.2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that the rule providing for an additional five days for a party to do some act required to be done after service of a document by mail does not apply to the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari).

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meekins v. Florida Department of Corrections
114 So. 3d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 1092, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 2010 WL 3190680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crumby-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.