Crumby v. State

41 So. 3d 1092, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 2010 WL 3190680
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2010·No. 1D10-2192·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Excel Auto Group, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Ill So.2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that the rule providing for an additional five days for a party to do some act required to be done after service of a document by mail does not apply to the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari).

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crumby v. State, 41 So. 3d 1092, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 2010 WL 3190680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

41 So. 3d 1092 (Crumby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meekins v. Florida Department of Corrections
114 So. 3d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)