Ex parte Young

168 Tex. Crim. 624
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 2, 1959
DocketNo. 31,120
StatusPublished

This text of 168 Tex. Crim. 624 (Ex parte Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Young, 168 Tex. Crim. 624 (Tex. 1959).

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Potter County remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff of said county for delivery to an agent for the State of South Carolina.

The sole question presented for review is the appellant’s contention that the Governor’s warrant was not introduced in evidence. Reliance is had upon Ex Parte Hagler, 161 Texas Cr. Rep. 223, 276 S.W. 2d 143. The statement of facts before us here reflects that the prosecutor stated to the court that he had “filed in this cause a Governor’s warrant from the Governor of Texas * * *” and this is followed by a copy of the same set forth in full. When appellant’s counsel approved a statement of facts, containing such warrant, as a full, true and correct statement of facts, he certified that such warrant was in fact introduced in evidence and cannot now question the manner of its tender or receipt into evidence.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hagler v. State
276 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Stephens v. St. Louis Public Service Company
276 S.W.2d 138 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 Tex. Crim. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-young-texcrimapp-1959.