Ex Parte Taylor

94 S.W.2d 480, 130 Tex. Crim. 349, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 231
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex Parte Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 29
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 1936·No. No. 18460.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge refusing to discharge the relator upon his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

From the order of the district judge remanding the relator, it is shown that evidence was adduced to the effect that the relator was properly and legally held in custody by virtue of proper requisition papers from the State of Tennessee. The facts not having been brought forward, this court is without any evidence which contradicts the findings of the trial judge, as certified in his order. The presumption must prevail that the facts supported the trial court’s ruling.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Taylor, 94 S.W.2d 480, 130 Tex. Crim. 349, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 231 (Tex. 1936).

94 S.W.2d 480 (Ex Parte Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.