Ex Parte Taylor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Taylor

94 S.W.2d 480, 130 Tex. Crim. 349, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 231

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 13, 1936

DocketNo. 18460.

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.W.2d 480 (Ex Parte Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Taylor, 94 S.W.2d 480, 130 Tex. Crim. 349, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 231 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge refusing to discharge the relator upon his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

From the order of the district judge remanding the relator, it is shown that evidence was adduced to the effect that the relator was properly and legally held in custody by virtue of proper requisition papers from the State of Tennessee. The facts not having been brought forward, this court is without any evidence which contradicts the findings of the trial judge, as certified in his order. The presumption must prevail that the facts supported the trial court’s ruling.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge refusing to discharge the relator upon his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

From the order of the district judge remanding the relator, it is shown that evidence was adduced to the effect that the relator was properly and legally held in custody by virtue of proper requisition papers from the State of Tennessee. The facts not having been brought forward, this court is without any evidence which contradicts the findings of the trial judge, as certified in his order. The presumption must prevail that the facts supported the trial court’s ruling.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.W.2d 480, 130 Tex. Crim. 349, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-taylor-texcrimapp-1936.