Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 10, 1998
Docket10-98-00219-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan (Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan, (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Ex parte Steven Don McMahan


IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-98-219-CV


EX PARTE STEVEN DON McMAHAN



Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION


      This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. The court below found Steven Don McMahan in contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support. The court ordered McMahan confined for thirty days in the Falls County Jail, finding that he was $3,875 in arrears. The contempt order does not, however, include the pertinent provisions of the child support order which McMahan violated or the date of each occasion on which McMahan failed to pay such child support.

      The parties have filed a joint motion asking the Court to declare the order in question void; to discharge McMahan and his surety from the bond; and to cancel the hearing of this cause scheduled for July 15, 1998. We will grant the motion.

      Due process requires a contempt order to "clearly state in what respect the court's [earlier] order has been violated." Ex parte Shaklee, 939 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Tex. 1997) (quoting Ex parte Barnett, 600 S.W.2d 252, 256 (Tex. 1980)). Section 157.166(b) of the Family Code provides that a contempt order imposing incarceration "must contain findings setting out or incorporating by reference the provisions of the order for which enforcement was requested and the date of each occasion when the respondent failed to comply with the order." Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 157.166(b) (Vernon 1996).

      The order in this case does not satisfy the requirements of due process or section 157.166(b). Accordingly, it is void. See Ex parte Garcia, 795 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex. 1990) (orig. proceeding).

      Having found the contempt order void, we conclude McMahan is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, McMahan's application for a writ of habeas corpus is granted. McMahan and his surety are hereby discharged from their bond and from any and all restraints appertaining to the void order. The hearing of this cause scheduled for July 15, 1998, is canceled.

                                                                               PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Cummings, and

      Justice Vance

Writ granted

Opinion delivered and filed July 10, 1998

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Barnett
600 S.W.2d 252 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Ex Parte Shaklee
939 S.W.2d 144 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)
Ex parte Garcia
795 S.W.2d 740 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-steven-don-mcmahan-texapp-1998.