Ex parte Garcia

795 S.W.2d 740, 33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 702, 1990 Tex. LEXIS 108, 1990 WL 127332
Texas Supreme Court·Decided September 6, 1990·No. No. D-0163·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Fidencio Garcia was found in contempt of court by the 105th district court of Nueces County for failure to pay court-ordered child support. The district court ordered relator jailed, finding that he was $4,151 in arrears. The court failed to specify, however, the time, date, and place of each occasion on which relator failed to pay such child support.

The Texas Family Code provides in § 14.33(a) that if an enforcement order “imposes incarceration or a fine, [it] must contain findings setting out specifically ... the time, date, and place of each occasion on which the respondent failed to comply” with the child support order. Tex.Fam. Code § 14.33(a). Because the enforcement order does not contain the requisite specificity, it is not enforceable by contempt. Ex parte Holland, 790 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.1990).

Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 170, a majority of the court holds the district court’s order void and, without hearing oral argument, orders the court to set aside such order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Garcia, 795 S.W.2d 740, 33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 702, 1990 Tex. LEXIS 108, 1990 WL 127332 (Tex. 1990).

795 S.W.2d 740 (Ex parte Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in Re: Stanislav Bilder
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022
in Re Sh"Dawn Nicole Sullivan
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
in Re Joseph Peter Eguia
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
Ex Parte Steven Don McMahan
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998