Ex parte Squires v. Broome C .P.

10 Wend. 600
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1833·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

A suit was commenced against the relator by the filing of a declaration in the common pleas of Broome. The copy of the declaration was served upon the relator whilst he was out of the county of Broome, and for this cause he moved to set aside the proceedings of the plaintiff The motion of the defendant was resisted, by shewing that the defendant had obtained a rule requiring the plaintiff to file secuiity for costs in the suit thus pending, and the common pleas for this cause refused to set aside the proceedings of the plaintiff. A mandamus was now asked for, requiring the common pleas to grant the motion of the defendant, which was denied by the court on the ground that by asking for security for costs, the defendant-had given jurisdiction to the common pleas over his person* and had waived the irregularity of which he complained,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Squires v. Broome C .P., 10 Wend. 600 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

10 Wend. 600 (Ex parte Squires v. Broome C .P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Jennys v. Brennan
6 Thomp. & Cook 120 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)
State v. Richmond
26 N.H. 232 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
McAllister v. Albion Plank Road Co.
11 Barb. 610 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)