Ex parte Rodríguez
This text of 9 P.R. 263 (Ex parte Rodríguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OP THE COURT.
This Supreme Court has heard and carefully considered the appeal taken by Elenterio and Gervasio Rodriguez from the decision of the District Court of Guayama of May 31st last refusing to order their discharge from custody on a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that they had been sentenced by the Municipal Court of Cayey to imprisonment for six months and payment of the costs, for battery with aggravating circumstances, which offense, they allege, is neither defined in the Penal Code nor in the special law amending it, approved March 10th of last year. We are of the opinion [264]*264that although, .the appellants have been sentenced for battery with aggravating circumstances, as this term comprises assault also, the judgment rendered does not contain any defect which would render it null. For this reason we should affirm, and we do affirm, the decision of May 31st last appealed from, with the costs of the appeal against the appellants; and it is ordered that this decision he communicated to the District Court of Gruayama for the proper purposes.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 P.R. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-rodriguez-prsupreme-1905.