Ex Parte Rankin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Rankin

1917 OK CR 41, 162 P. 677, 13 Okla. Crim. 138, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1917

DocketNo. A-2910.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1917 OK CR 41 (Ex Parte Rankin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Rankin, 1917 OK CR 41, 162 P. 677, 13 Okla. Crim. 138, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

This is an application to this court for writ of habeas corpus by Charles Rankin, who represents and states that he is restrained of his liberty and is unlawfully imprisoned at Hugo, Choctaw county, by R. B. Fitzgerald, sheriff of said county. It is further averred that:

“The cause of said restraint is that heretofore on the - day of December, 1916, said petitioner was arrested and charged with the crime of robbery, and carried before L. W. Oakes, justice of the peace, for an examining trial *139 on the charge of having robbed the bank of Boswell, in Choctaw county. Petitioner waived his examining trial. Thereupon his bond was by said justice fixed in the sum of $20,000, and afterwards, to wit, on the 9th day of January, 1917, said petitioner was remanded to the custody of said sheriff by the judge of the district court of Choctaw county in default of bail in the sum of $20,000. Your petitioner avers and says that said sum of bail so fixed by the justice of the peace is excessive.”

Petitioner prays that a writ of habeas corpus issue, and that said excessive bail be reduced and fixed at a reasonable amount. The petition was filed in this court on January 19, 1917, and a rule to show cause was entered and issued, returnable January 29th, at which time a hearing was had upon the affidavits filed in support of the application and those filed in resisting the same.

The mere fact that a defendant cannot make bond in the sum fixed by the committing magistrate and the trial court does not necessarily make such amount excessive. Regard must be had to the nature of the crime charged and the character of the evidence by which it is supported. In re Jacobs, 4 Okla. Cr. 346,. 111 Pac, 815. As . this case is yet to be tried, we do not deem it proper to discuss the evidence further than to remark that upon 'the evidence adduced we do not feel that this court would be warranted in granting a reduction of bail in this case on the ground that the amount fixed is excessive.

The application for a reduction of bail is therefore denied.

ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

This is an application to this court for writ of habeas corpus by Charles Rankin, who represents and states that he is restrained of his liberty and is unlawfully imprisoned at Hugo, Choctaw county, by R. B. Fitzgerald, sheriff of said county. It is further averred that:

“The cause of said restraint is that heretofore on the - day of December, 1916, said petitioner was arrested and charged with the crime of robbery, and carried before L. W. Oakes, justice of the peace, for an examining trial *139 on the charge of having robbed the bank of Boswell, in Choctaw county. Petitioner waived his examining trial. Thereupon his bond was by said justice fixed in the sum of $20,000, and afterwards, to wit, on the 9th day of January, 1917, said petitioner was remanded to the custody of said sheriff by the judge of the district court of Choctaw county in default of bail in the sum of $20,000. Your petitioner avers and says that said sum of bail so fixed by the justice of the peace is excessive.”

Petitioner prays that a writ of habeas corpus issue, and that said excessive bail be reduced and fixed at a reasonable amount. The petition was filed in this court on January 19, 1917, and a rule to show cause was entered and issued, returnable January 29th, at which time a hearing was had upon the affidavits filed in support of the application and those filed in resisting the same.

The mere fact that a defendant cannot make bond in the sum fixed by the committing magistrate and the trial court does not necessarily make such amount excessive. Regard must be had to the nature of the crime charged and the character of the evidence by which it is supported. In re Jacobs, 4 Okla. Cr. 346,. 111 Pac, 815. As . this case is yet to be tried, we do not deem it proper to discuss the evidence further than to remark that upon 'the evidence adduced we do not feel that this court would be warranted in granting a reduction of bail in this case on the ground that the amount fixed is excessive.

The application for a reduction of bail is therefore denied.

ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 41, 162 P. 677, 13 Okla. Crim. 138, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-rankin-oklacrimapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack