Patton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Patton v. State

1929 OK CR 115, 275 P. 1075, 42 Okla. Crim. 315, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 374

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 6, 1929

DocketNo. A-6609.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 115 (Patton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patton v. State, 1929 OK CR 115, 275 P. 1075, 42 Okla. Crim. 315, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 374 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county upon an indictment returned by the grand jury to the district court and by that court transferred to the county court, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a term of 80 days.

The judgement was rendered January 18, 1927. The appeal was lodged in this court May 14, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence amply sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county upon an indictment returned by the grand jury to the district court and by that court transferred to the county court, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a term of 80 days.

The judgement was rendered January 18, 1927. The appeal was lodged in this court May 14, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence amply sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 115, 275 P. 1075, 42 Okla. Crim. 315, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.