Ex Parte O'Quinn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte O'Quinn

1952 OK CR 104, 247 P.2d 537, 95 Okla. Crim. 430, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 297

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 6, 1952

DocketA-11820

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1952 OK CR 104 (Ex Parte O'Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte O'Quinn, 1952 OK CR 104, 247 P.2d 537, 95 Okla. Crim. 430, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 297 (Okla. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

BRETT, P. J.

This is an original petition in habeas corpus brought by petitioner Raymond O’Quinn, for the purpose of being admitted to bail upon a charge of the murder of Elton Akins now pending against him in the district court of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma.

The verified petition alleges that the petitioner is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty in the county jail of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma, where he is awaiting trial on an information pending in aforesaid district court in the said county. He alleges that proof of guilt of said crime allegedly committed on July 1, 1952, is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. It appears that he was denied bail at the preliminary hearing before a justice of the peace, 'and in a habeas corpus proceeding in the district court of Pushmataha county. On hearing herein on July 31, 1952, a transcript of the proceedings in the justice of the peace court was offered in evidence; witnesses were sworn and oral evidence offered by the petitioner himself. It will not be necessary to set out the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to say that, the petitioner testified in re *431 lation to prior personal difficulties and fights between himself and Elton Akins in which .O’Quinn had been severely beaten, and that at the killing O’Quinn testified that the decedent was reaching for his pistol when he shot Akins. Further it appears herein that after Akins was shot he did shoot at the petitioner a time or two. This delineation only includes the gist of the petitioner’s evidence; it does not include the state’s case as offered at the preliminary. The district court did not have the benefit of this evidence in its habeas corpus proceeding. "We do not desire to comment on the weight of the evidence. Nevertheless, the petitioner has made a sufficient showing to entitle him to hail. Ex parte Christenberry, 82 Okla. Cr. 378, 170 P. 2d 871: Ex parte Lee, 91 Okla. Cr. 426, 219 P. 2d 638.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitttd to bail in the sum of $25,000, to be approved by the district court clerk of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma, and when said bond is given and approved by the district court clerk, that the petitioner be discharged from custody to await trial, and the further order of said district court.

JONES and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRETT, P. J.

This is an original petition in habeas corpus brought by petitioner Raymond O’Quinn, for the purpose of being admitted to bail upon a charge of the murder of Elton Akins now pending against him in the district court of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma.

The verified petition alleges that the petitioner is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty in the county jail of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma, where he is awaiting trial on an information pending in aforesaid district court in the said county. He alleges that proof of guilt of said crime allegedly committed on July 1, 1952, is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. It appears that he was denied bail at the preliminary hearing before a justice of the peace, 'and in a habeas corpus proceeding in the district court of Pushmataha county. On hearing herein on July 31, 1952, a transcript of the proceedings in the justice of the peace court was offered in evidence; witnesses were sworn and oral evidence offered by the petitioner himself. It will not be necessary to set out the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to say that, the petitioner testified in re *431 lation to prior personal difficulties and fights between himself and Elton Akins in which .O’Quinn had been severely beaten, and that at the killing O’Quinn testified that the decedent was reaching for his pistol when he shot Akins. Further it appears herein that after Akins was shot he did shoot at the petitioner a time or two. This delineation only includes the gist of the petitioner’s evidence; it does not include the state’s case as offered at the preliminary. The district court did not have the benefit of this evidence in its habeas corpus proceeding. "We do not desire to comment on the weight of the evidence. Nevertheless, the petitioner has made a sufficient showing to entitle him to hail. Ex parte Christenberry, 82 Okla. Cr. 378, 170 P. 2d 871: Ex parte Lee, 91 Okla. Cr. 426, 219 P. 2d 638.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitttd to bail in the sum of $25,000, to be approved by the district court clerk of Pushmataha county, Oklahoma, and when said bond is given and approved by the district court clerk, that the petitioner be discharged from custody to await trial, and the further order of said district court.

JONES and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1952 OK CR 104, 247 P.2d 537, 95 Okla. Crim. 430, 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-oquinn-oklacrimapp-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack