Ex Parte Lee

1950 OK CR 79, 219 P.2d 638, 91 Okla. Crim. 426, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 14, 1950
DocketA-11441
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1950 OK CR 79 (Ex Parte Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Lee, 1950 OK CR 79, 219 P.2d 638, 91 Okla. Crim. 426, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229 (Okla. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

POWELL, J.

This is an original proceeding in ha-beas corpus instituted' by the petitioner, Albert Lee, for the' purpose of being admitted to bail upon a charge of murder now pending against him in the district court of McCurtain county.

The verified petition alleges that petitioner is restrained in the county jail of McCurtain county, where he is awaiting trial by reason of an information filed in the district court of said county, but that' the proof of his guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. Attached to the petition and made a part thereof is a verified statement, executed by the petitioner, purport-ting to set out the facts in connection with the death with *427 which he is charged, and which, if true, would support a plea of self-defense.

Hearing was had before this court, and the proof developed that the defendant was denied bail by the district court of McCurtain county. There was submitted for the consideration of the court a transcript of the evidence introduced at the hearing upon the examination, had before the county judge of McCurtain county, acting as an examining magistrate, and this court has considered said evidence.

The petitioner in this court testified at. length, and was cross-examined by the county attorney of McCurtain county. Defendant testified that he hit the deceased in the head with a heavy wrench while deceased was pursuing defendant with a loaded pistol around defendant’s truck; that deceased dropped the pistol but tried to regain it, and that defendant hit deceased with the wrench several times more, and that deceased became unconscious and finally died.

The state could produce no eyewitness to the encounter. When defendant, in a hearing as here, takes the witness stand and testifies in detail, and submits himself to cross-examination, such fact lends weight to the alleged factual situation in support of said self-defense claim.

We do not desire to make any comment upon the weight of the evidence, but it is our conclusion, after an examination of the transcript of the record heretofore mentioned, and a consideration of the evidence presented in open court, that the petitioner has made a sufficient showing to be entitled to bail. Ex parte Christenberry, 82 Okla. Cr. 378, 170 P. 2d 871, and the cases therein cited.

*428 It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $20,000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, to be approved by the court clerk of McCurtain county; and when said bond is given and approved by the court clerk of said county, that petitioner be discharged from custody.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of Cody
1961 OK CR 51 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Habeas Corpus of Neal
1956 OK CR 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1956)
Ex parte Beavers
1954 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1954)
Ex Parte O'Quinn
1952 OK CR 104 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)
Trent v. State
1952 OK CR 33 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1950 OK CR 79, 219 P.2d 638, 91 Okla. Crim. 426, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-lee-oklacrimapp-1950.