Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens
This text of Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens (Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 4, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00576-CR
EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS, Appellant
On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1688385
CONCURRING OPINION
I respectfully concur. The majority opinion discusses whether the State’s conduct in this case is substantially unconstitutional, thus implying that there is a permissible category of unconstitutional restrictions because they do not constitute a “substantial” violation. Because I believe that all unconstitutional restrictions should have a remedy but that the State’s actions are not unconstitutional in this case, I concur.
/s/ Meagan Hassan Justice
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan (Jewell, J., majority). Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-medger-chauncey-duckens-texapp-2022.