Ex Parte McCorvey
This text of 686 So. 2d 425 (Ex Parte McCorvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We granted the writ of certiorari in order to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the defendant's criminal conviction. That court affirmed by an unpublished memorandum, pursuant to Rule 54, Ala. R. App. P. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in permitting the State to impeach his credibility as a witness by eliciting evidence regarding his probationary status as a youthful offender.
We reverse. We adopt the reasoning of Judge Taylor, expressed in his opinion dissenting from the no-opinion affirmance.McCorvey v. State,
"As the basis for its holding, the majority relies upon . . . Davis v. Alaska,
415 U.S. 308 ,94 S.Ct. 1105 ,39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)."The majority, however, misapplies Davis. The Court's decision in Davis was based on balancing a juvenile delinquent witness's right to anonymity against a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. This case does not present such a compelling constitutional reason to abrogate the long-standing policy of protecting the anonymity of juvenile offenders."
686 So.2d at 424.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, and COOK, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, J., concurs specially.
BUTTS, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 425, 1996 WL 390868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mccorvey-ala-1996.