Ex Parte Luther Garner
This text of Ex Parte Luther Garner (Ex Parte Luther Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Luther Garner, appellant, appeals from the trial court's order denying his request for access to the record after conviction. Unless specifically authorized by statute, an appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only from a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.-Waco 1999, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).
Garner has not demonstrated that the denial of his post-conviction motion requesting access to the record is a separately appealable order. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review the ruling on Garner's motion. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and deny all pending motions.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
__________________________________
HOLLIS HORTON
Justice
Opinion Delivered November 19, 2008
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Luther Garner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-luther-garner-texapp-2008.