Ex Parte Harding

120 U.S. 782, 7 S. Ct. 780, 30 L. Ed. 824, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2018
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 21, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by54 cases

This text of 120 U.S. 782 (Ex Parte Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Harding, 120 U.S. 782, 7 S. Ct. 780, 30 L. Ed. 824, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2018 (1887).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied.. This court has no jurisdiction for ' the discharge on habeas corpus of a person imprisoned under the sentence of a territorial court in a criminal case, unless the sentence exceeds the jurisdiction of that court, or there is no *784 authority to hold him under the sentence. Ex parte Wilson, 114 U. S. 417, 420, and the cases there cited. The fact that a law of the. territory allowed an alien who had declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States to sit on a grand jury, and that an-alien did- in fact sit on the jury that found the indictment against this' petitioner, did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction for his trial under the indictment. • The objection, if it be one, goes only to the regu-. larity of the proceedings, not to the jurisdiction of the court. The same is true of the allegation in the petition that the petitioner was denied his right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. For such errors or irregularities, if they exist, a judgment is not void, and a writ of habeas corpus gives this court no authority for their correction.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sykes v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
93 A.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Selby v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
92 A.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Hill v. Town of Conway
193 F.3d 33 (First Circuit, 1999)
Draughn v. Jabe
803 F. Supp. 70 (E.D. Michigan, 1992)
Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
480 U.S. 39 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Williams v. Wayne County Sheriff
235 N.W.2d 552 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1975)
Elizabeth Ann Duke v. The State of Texas
477 F.2d 244 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Keener v. Tennessee
281 F. Supp. 964 (E.D. Tennessee, 1968)
Smith v. Brough
248 F. Supp. 435 (D. Maryland, 1965)
Smith v. State
214 A.2d 563 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
Chamberlain v. Delgado
82 P.R. 287 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)
McCutheon v. Warden
138 A.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
United States ex rel. Leguillou v. Davis
115 F. Supp. 392 (Virgin Islands, 1953)
Sunal v. Large
332 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Edmondson v. Brady
52 A.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1947)
Garner v. Alexander
120 P.2d 238 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
Noland v. Noland
111 F.2d 322 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Bridwell v. Aderhold
13 F. Supp. 253 (N.D. Georgia, 1935)
Selness v. United States
67 F.2d 1010 (Ninth Circuit, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 U.S. 782, 7 S. Ct. 780, 30 L. Ed. 824, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-harding-scotus-1887.