Ex parte Gandía

6 P.R. 229

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided April 7, 1904·No. No. 130·Published

Opinion

Me. Justice MacLeaey,

after stating the foregoing facts delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

Having examined articles 778, 794 and 1081 of the Oivil [233]*233Code, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appellant.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández, Higue-ras and Sulzbacher 'concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Justice MacLeaey,

after stating the foregoing facts delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

Having examined articles 778, 794 and 1081 of the Oivil [233]*233Code, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appellant.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández, Higue-ras and Sulzbacher 'concurred.

Ex parte Gandía, 6 P.R. 229 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

6 P.R. 229 (Ex parte Gandía) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.