Ex parte Carrasquillo

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Ex parte Carrasquillo

7 P.R. 113

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedJune 5, 1904

DocketNo. 51

StatusPublished

This text of 7 P.R. 113 (Ex parte Carrasquillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Carrasquillo, 7 P.R. 113 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from.

In view of the provisions of article 395 of the Mortgage Law in force, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appéllant..

Justices Hernández, Higueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from.

In view of the provisions of article 395 of the Mortgage Law in force, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appéllant..

Justices Hernández, Higueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.R. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-carrasquillo-prsupreme-1904.