Ex parte Carrasquillo

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Ex parte Carrasquillo

7 P.R. 113

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided June 5, 1904·No. No. 51·Published

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from.

In view of the provisions of article 395 of the Mortgage Law in force, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appéllant..

Justices Hernández, Higueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from.

In view of the provisions of article 395 of the Mortgage Law in force, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appéllant..

Justices Hernández, Higueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Ex parte Carrasquillo, 7 P.R. 113 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

7 P.R. 113 (Ex parte Carrasquillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.