Ex parte Burford

7 U.S. 448
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 U.S. 448 (Ex parte Burford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Burford, 7 U.S. 448 (1806).

Opinion

The Judges of this Court were unanimously of opinion, that the warrant of commitment was illegal, for want of stating some good cause certain, supported by oath. If the circuit court had proceeded de novo, perhaps, it might have made a difference. But this court is of opinion, that that court has gone only upon the proceedings before the justices. It has gone so far as to correct two of the errors committed, but the rest remain. If the prisoner is really a person of ill fame, and ought to find sureties for his good behavior, the justices may proceed de novo, and take care that their proceedings are regular.

The prisoner is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Burford
7 U.S. 448 (Supreme Court, 1806)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-burford-scotus-1806.