Ex Parte Armando Ramos

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 2021·No. 04-21-00203-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2021

No. 04-21-00203-CR

EX PARTE Armando RAMOS

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR6442-W1 The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 2, 2021, appellant pro se filed “Objection to Appeal Courts Denial of Standby Counsel and Request for Reconsideration.” Without regard to whether this court has jurisdiction over the motion, we DENY AS MOOT the motion on the basis that appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of December, 2021.

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Armando Ramos, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Ex Parte Armando Ramos (Ex Parte Armando Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Patrick v. State
906 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)