Ex Parte Armando Ramos

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 20, 2021
Docket04-21-00203-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Armando Ramos (Ex Parte Armando Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Armando Ramos, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 20, 2021

No. 04-21-00203-CR

EX PARTE ARMANDO RAMOS

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR6442-W1 Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER On April 9, 2021, the trial court signed an order denying Armando Ramos’s application for post-conviction writ of habeus corpus. The clerk’s record does not include the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) requires the trial court to sign a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. Rule 25.2(d) requires the clerk’s record to include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Although this certification “should be part of the record when notice is filed,” it “may be added by timely amendment or supplementation under this rule or . . . by order of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2).” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2) (explaining that “[i]f the appellate court in a criminal case orders the trial court to prepare and file . . . [a] certification of the defendant’s right of appeal as required by these rules, the trial court clerk must prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental clerk’s record”). If a certification showing the defendant has the right to appeal is not made part of the record under these rules, the appeal must be dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Because the clerk’s record does not include the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal following its denial of Ramos’s application for post-conviction writ of habeus corpus, we ORDER the trial court, if it has not yet signed a certification of defendants right of appeal, to sign such a certification on or before July 30, 2021. We further ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal on or before August 9, 2021.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice FILE COPY

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Armando Ramos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-armando-ramos-texapp-2021.